CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
A. The Background of the
Study
English is one of the most used language in the
world. It has an important role in becoming a second language or foreign
language. In Indonesia, English becomes
a foreign language. It is to introduce the
language to students as the first foreign language and to prepare the students
in mastering the four language skills.It
is taught in school started from kindergarten. The government has already
understood that citizens will be faced by new era that forces people to speak
English, so they bring it in school’s curriculum as a subject.
Basically, teachers in Senior High School provide
materials by including four language skills. They are : listening, speaking,
reading, and writing. Those four language skills are the basic competences in
english. They are inserted in the materials. Ideally, they are taught by
teachers in the same duration so the students can train their skills by good
time management in the class.
The four language skills force teachers to be
creative in teaching. Students usually get bored by traditional strategy,
because they just sitting down and listening to the teacher’s explanation.
Freire ( 1999 ) gave term to that kind of teaching as a “bank style” education
because it was seen as an information giving activity that must be “swallowed”
by the students and must be remembered and memorized.
By considering that thing, Students can not have
full mastery in those four language skills especially in speaking skills.
Speaking skills need students to have full mastery in certain vocabulary. In
studying english, speaking is the most scarying. They are still confused in
speaking, and the students mostly they are shy to speak English.
In the classroom, bassically students do not have
ability in comprehending the materials. Speaking is the most confusing because
they have difficulties in memorizing words and also pronuncing that. Those
difficulties make students lazy in studying english. On the other hand,
teacher’s explanation can not easily accepted by the students. It is a big
factor that makes students get difficulties in learning english. Ocasionally
teachers of Senior High School still use traditional strategy that just make them get
bored.The teachers do not modify it,
they just apply what the procedure of the strategy that included in English handbook. Sometimes, the students do not pay
attention to the teacher’s explanation and make noise in the classroom if they
have felt bored with the technique that used by the teacher.They need special teaching method that attracts them
to study english.
To solve that problems, teachers should provide
special treatment to attract students in studying. One of the strategy is by using a game because it also helps the students
create contexts, in which the language is useful and meaningful (Wright, 1984).
Furthermore, those games should be highly motivating because they are amusing
and interesting. In this case, the
researcher uses Hangman game. Teaching english by using Hangman game is a funny
strategy, so it is expected that students will be more enthusias to learn new
vocabulary to make them easier to improve their speaking skills.
To start the research, the researcher chooses SMA N
1 Pringsurat grade X because most of the students are from village so they just
know little bit of english. The grade X is choosen because the students just
moved from Junior High School and they need to be guided in studying english.
- The
Identification of the problems
Based on the background of the study above, the
researcher tries to identify the problems in teaching english in junior high
school, they are :
1.
The
students are bored with traditional strategy
2.
The
students are confused to speak english
3.
The
students are shy to speak english
4.
The
gap of the students’ ability in comprehending the materials
5.
The
teachers do not have creativity in attracting the students to study
6.
The
students have difficulties in memorizing the words
- The
Limitation of the Problems
To make the time more effective, and because of the
limited knowledge of the researcher, the researcher makes limitation of the
problem on “Using Hangman Game To Improve Speaking Skills To The First Graders
Of SMA N 1 Pringsurat In The School Year 2017 / 2018”.
- The
Formulation of the Problems
Based on the identification and limitation of the
problems, the researcher formulates the problem as :
1.
Is
there any significant differences of students’ speaking skills before and after
they are taught by using hangman game strategy ?
2.
How
big is the significant differences of students’ speaking skills before and
after they are taught by using hangman game strategy ?
- The
Objective of the Study
The objective of the study canbe stated as :
1.
To
know whether there is a significant difference of students’ speaking skills
before and after they are taught by using hangman game strategy or not
2.
To
know whether students have good speaking skills after they are taught by using
hangman game strategy
- The
Significant of the Study
The result of the research is expected to be useful
for :
1.
The
teachers
The research supports the teachers to apply the trategy
in teaching english. This strategy can also make the teachers to be more
creative in teaching english.
2.
The
Students
The students are expected to be more enthusias and
interested in developing their english speaking skills.
CHAPTER II
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
A. Theoritical Background
1.
Speaking
Skills
a.
The
Point of View of Speaking Skills
Tarigan
(1990 : 3 – 4) defines that speaking is a language skill that is developed in
child life, which is produced by listening skill, and at that period speaking
skill is learned.
According
to Ladouse (in Nunan, 1991 : 23) speaking is described as the activity as the
ability to express oneself in the situation, or the activity to report acts, or
situation in precise words or the ability to converse or to express a sequence
of ideas fluently.
Based
on the Competence Based Curriculum, speaking is one of the four basic
competences that the students should gain well. It has an important role in
communication.
Furthermore,
Wilson (1983:5) defines speaking as development of the relationship between
speaker and listener. It means that the main objective of speaking is for
communication. When someone speaks to other person, there will be a
relationship. The relationship itself is communication. From the explanation
can be concluded that speaking skill is an ability to express feeling or idea
to gain a relation between the speaker and the listener.
b.
Kinds
of Speaking Skill
According
to Brown (2003:141) there are several types of speaking performances, they are
:
1)
Imitative
At
one end of a continum of types of speaking performance is the ability to simply
parrot back (imitate) a word or phrase or possibly a sentence. While this is
purely phonetic level of oral production, a number of prosodic, lexical and
grammatical properties of language may
be concluded in the criterion performance.
2)
Intensive
A
second type of speaking frequently employed in assessment contexts is the
production of short stretches of oral language designed to demonstrate
competence
in narrow band of grammatical, phrasal, lexical of phonological relationship
(such as prosodic element intonation, stress, rhythm, juncture). Examples of
extensive assessment tasks include directed response tasks, reading aloud,
sentence and dialogue completion limited picture – cued task including simple
sequnces and relationship up to the simple sentence level.
3)
Responsive
Responsive
assessment tasks included interaction and test comprehension but at somewhat
limited level of very short conversations, standard greetings and a small talk,
simple request and comments and the
like.
c.
Technique
of Teaching Speaking
Harmer
(in Tarigan, 1990:13) writes that when teaching speaking or producing skill, we
can apply three major stages, those are :
1)
Introducing
new language
2)
Practice
3)
Communicative
activities
2. Teaching English Speaking Skill in Senior High School
As
stated in Standard Competence and Basic Competence, English is aimed to improve
four language skills in order to make the students able to communicate and
discourse in order to make students able to communicate and discourse in
english in certain stage of literacy.
The
literacy stage includes performative, functional, information, and epistemic.
At the performative stage, sstudents are able to read, write, listen, and speak
by certain symbols. At the functional stage, students are able to use language
to fulfil daily life like reading newspaper, manual or instruction. At the
informational stage, students are able to access knowledge by language ability,
while at the epistemic stage students are able to express knowledge in target
language (Wells,1987). So, english is needed to equip the students in their
daily life.
1)
Purposes
English
in Senbior High School is aimed to make students to be able to
improve competence in communicating orally and written to reach the functional
stage.
2)
The
Scope
The
scope of english in Senior High School including
ability in discourse or to comprehend and / or to produce spoken text and / or
written text which is stated in four language skills (listening, speaking,
reading, and writing) integrately to reach functional stage.
3)
Students
Psychology
The
students of Senior High School grade X are different from the other because in this grade,
they are in the shift between Junior High School
and Senior
High School. So, simple materials
and the way to deliver the materials should be interesting to get their
attention fully.
4)
Time
Allotment
This lesson is
given once a week in 2 x 45 minutes based
on the school’s policy. While the teaching method by using english song just
takes 1 x 45 minutes or one lesson
hour.
3. Hangman Strategy
Hangman teaching
strategy is an interactive way to teach speaking skills. This step is efficient
and can help students to remember vocabularies in a funny way.
Hangman strategy
steps :
Write a word in a piece of
paper, then hide it.
Make line same as the
words .
Write a letter of the word
in a line.
The position of the letter
must be same with the real word.
Ask a student of the group to
guess the letter (first, second, etc) from the word.
Then, ask another student to
guess fill the other line.
If the student guess wrong, so
the student of the group must draw a pole; for other mistake cross; the next
will be rope, then head, etc.
If a group makes much
mistakes so they will get a man who is hanged.
The group that gets that
drawing will be lost.
CHAPTER
III
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
A.
Research Design
The researcher conducts
this research by applying Classroom Action Research. Classroom Action Research is a method of finding out what works best in your
own classroom so that you can improve student
learning.
Classroom
Action Research flow
Early
Reflection, original plan in doing research or first thought occurs in
arranging a research. The researcher also considers the results or effects of
actions later.
Field
introduction, The step after getting the plan the researcher analyzes the
target field includes where the school is, what grades, what the problem occurs
in the field, and all needed data for the research.
Problem
Formulation, researcher decides the problem occurs in the classroom that will
be analyzed its solution.
First
action, the researcher applies the method they choose for the target students.
First
Observation, the researcher does the observation after applying the first
action
First
Reflection, the researcher analyzes the result of the first action includes the
success and effectiveness of her first action.
Re
planning, the researcher makes a revised draft for the next cycle.
B. The Place, Time And Subject Of Study
1. Place of Research: The place for getting the
desired data. The research is held at SMA N 1 Pringsurat
2. Time Research is the time course of study or
research when the research take place. This study is conducted in semester 2017/2018.
3. Subjects were students of class X SMA N 1
Pringsurat on the understanding and mastery of vocabulary.
C. Data Collection Techniques
The data needed in this study are obtained through
observation in Hangman strategy process
learning, teacher observation of student motivation, interview, and test
D. The Data Collection Instruments
The instrument used in this study consisted of:
1. Syllabus
It is a set of plans and regulations on administration
of classroom learning activities, and assessment of learning outcomes.
2. Lesson Plan (RPP)
That is a learning device for guiding teachers in
teaching and prepared for each round. Each RPP contains basic competences,
indicators of achievement of learning outcomes, specific learning objectives
and learning activities.
3. Formative tests
Formative test is a test for assessing the students
achievement after getting lesson using the researcher new teaching method. From
the formative test we will know the success and the effectiveness of the
researcher’ method.
E. Data Analysis Techniques
The researcher does an analyzes to measure the success
and effectivenees of the method. Qualitative descriptive techniques are used in
this research. It measures the result of the research by describing the fact or
fact in order to determine student achievement, to obtain the response of the
students to the learning process and activities of the student is the learning
process. To analyze success rate or percentage of student success after the
learning process every round is done by giving an evaluation form about the
written test at the end of each round.
This analysis was calculated using a formula below
1. To assess the test or tests formative
The researcher sums all of the mark students got and
the it ia divided with the number of the students. So that we will get the
average value. We can formulate by.
By: = average mark
Σ X = Total all marks of students
Σ N = Number of students
2. For mastery learning
The mastery learning of the students is divided into
two types, first is individually and the second is by group. To measure the
students individual mastery we can see the student achieve the minimum completeness
criteria (KKM) individually. Then, to measure the class achievement we can do
by analyzing the class achievement by class average mark, more than the minimum
completeness criteria (KKM) or not.
REFERENCES
Larsen
& Freeman. 1986. Technique and Principle in Language Teaching. Oxford
University Press, Inc. English
Harmer, J. 1983. The Practice of English Language
Teaching. London: William Cloves Limited, Beccles and London
Cameron, Lynne. 1990.
Teaching Language to Young Learners. The Edinburgh Building. Cambridge, New
York: Cambridge University Press.
0 comments:
Post a Comment