Sexual assault and sexual abuse of children

Labels

Wednesday 21 November 2018

USING REFUND STRATEGY TO IMPROVE READING SKILL OF THE TENTH GRADERS OF SMA N 5 MAGELANG IN THE SCHOOL YEAR 2017/2018

USING REFUND STRATEGY TO IMPROVE READING  SKILL OF THE TENTH GRADERS OF SMA N 5 MAGELANG
IN THE SCHOOL YEAR 2017/2018

A PAPER
Presented as Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Final Test of the
Seminar On LT Class

Image result for logo untidar
By:
NOVA HAIDAR HAQ (1420302196)


ENGLISH DEPARTMENT
FACULTY OF EDUCATION AND TEACHERS TRAINING
TIDAR UNIVERSITY
2017

CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION

A.    Background of The Study

English is very important for all of us.English is one of important subjects taught to students besides the other primary subjects at school.. In general, it is taught from the elementary schools up to universities level. Moreover, it is also learned to informal course to pass the examination as necessary part for career progression while working for an organization or business with an international concept.As an International language, most of people in the world use English to communicate among people, to make relationship, and to get social culture, science, economy, and technology goals. It is to increase their knowledge and to face global competition. 
Most of the people in the world use it, not only as the communication but also as transferring knowledge. In learning English, there are four skills that have to be learned by the students. They are listening, speaking, reading and writing. Reading is one of skills which are very essential for each student. By reading, the readers can increase their understanding about the text or what they have read, enrich their vocabularies and knowledge. Besides it can make the people easy to connect their ideas on reading towards what they have already known. 
    In teaching reading English as a foreign language, the teacher usually face different difficult in the classroom such as the students are at different levels, the class is very big, the students do not want to speak English or keep using their own language, and the students are not in cooperative. Hammer (1988:127) describes the difficulties faced by the teachers in teaching speaking and in the classroom solution.
Reading is a fluent process of readers combining information from a text and their own background knowledge to build meaning. The goal of reading is comprehension (Nunan, 2003: 68). Comprehension is an active process that involves all these strategies and behaviors (Crown, 2005: 2).
According to Hodgson in Tarigan (2008: 7), reading is a process that is carried and used by readers to get the message, which would be submitted by the author through the medium of words/written language.  A process which requires that a group of words that unity will be seen in a glimpse and that the meaning of individual words would be known. If this is not complete, meaning from themessages on textc will not be received or understood, and the process of reading it is not good performing.
Comprehension is the reason for reading - a cognitive activity relying on excellent fluency, vocabulary, and prior knowledge. Reading is not a passive activity; active interactive processes are critically necessary to the development of reading comprehension; and even able readers benefit from explicit instruction in the use of reading strategies (Karin, 2007: 15). 
The relationship between reading and language teaching “Although this involves neither listening to the language nor speaking it, reading is an important means of maintaining contact with a second language (Iskandarwassid&Sunendar, 2008: 246). Teaching reading usually has at least two aspects. First, it can refer to teaching learners who are learning to read for the very first time. A second aspect of teaching reading refers to teaching learners who already have reading skills in their first language. The learners only learn to read once. Once the students have learned how to read in one language, then do not learn how to read again in a second/foreign language, but rather the students learn how to transfer skills that they are have already learned to the new reading context in a new language (Nunan, 2003: 68).
Based on the researcher’s pre observation in SMA N 5 Magelang, there is a problem that researcher found there. The problem is the students were not able to comprehend the text well. It can be proved when the students did an exercise, they could not get good score because they could not answer the question well. Example: What is the story about? What is the purpose of the text?, etc. Then, when the teacher asks the students, not all of the students give response well, because they do not understand what they read. It may be caused by teacher’s strategy in teaching learning process. In teaching reading, they just read the text without comprehending the text. The teacher just asked the students to do an assignment without paying attention whether the students understand or not about the text. So, the teacher does not know the difficulties of the students in reading comprehension. The students just can read aloud but they can’t comprehend about what they read.  
From the fact of the problem at the seventh grade of SMA N 5 Magelang above, it is important to use an appropriate learning strategy in reading. According to O’ Malley and Chamot in Iskandarwassid and Sunendar (2008: 3), strategy is a
set of useful tools as well active, which involve individuals.
Many students still found difficulties and problems in comprehending the text, especially their lack of vocabularies, structure and the process of understanding the ideas in the text. The difficulties may be caused by several factors such as background knowledge, interest, attitude and the teacher. It is already known that the suitable technique and strategies can help both teacher and learners in teaching process. In this case, the writer tries to use REFUND strategy in classroom especially in teaching descriptive text to the students. By implementing this strategy the writer hopes that it can help the students to read well and increase their reading ability smoothly. Furthermore, to increase students’ reading comprehension, the teacher should apply an effective strategy in teaching reading. 
Realizing to the reality above it is necessary to find and formulate a method that can embrace all the differences that are owned by the students. Learning method offered is The REFUND Strategy. Based on the phenomenon above, the researcher conduct a classroom action research (CAR), entitled: “Improving Students’ Reading Comprehension by using REFUND Strategy at tenth garade of SMA N 5 Magelang in  Academic Year of 2017/2018”.

B.     The identification of the Problems

Based on the background of the study and on the description above, the identificatios of problem in this research are: 

1.      The students fear of English
2.      The students feel bored to study English especially Reading
3.      The students feel strange of English
4.      The students not interested when the teacher give the reading learning
5.      The students have difficulties in understanding English text reading
C.    Limitation of the Problem
To avoid misunderstanding of the problem in this study, it is very important for the researcher to limits the problem. REFUND strategy is very simple, easy to be applied for Senior High School students, and also effective. In REFUND Strategy, there are activity could be performed during reading individually, in small groups, or with the whole class. The teacher assists students in comprehending what they read as they explore the main ideas in a text as well as the organization of the text.


D.    Formulation of the Problem
Based on the identification and the limitation of the problems, the writer formulates the problems such as ;
1.      Does REFUND Strategy improve student’s reading comprehension at tenth grade of SMA N 5 MAGELANG in the school year 2017/2018?
2.      How can REFUND Strategy improve students’ reading comprehension at tenth grade of SMA N 5 MAGELANG in the school year 2017/2108?


E.     Objectives of the Problem
According to the formulation of the problem, the obejective of the study to find out: 
1.      To know whether REFUND  Strategy can improve Reading Comprehension at tenth grade of  SMA N 5 MAGELANG in the school year 2017/2108
2.      How can REFUND Strategy improve Reading Comprehension

F.     Significances of the Problem
The Significance of Study 
After completing all research activities, this study is expected to give significant contribution presented as follows:


A. English teachers
Teacher, particularly the English teacher of SMA N 5 Magelang can apply this strategy in the frame work of improving teaching ability and increasing the students’ reading ability.
B. Students
Students, particularly the tenth grade of SMA N 5 Magelang in Academic Year of 2017/2018, are expected to practice reading as good as possible by using REFUND Strategy and to make more interested in learning English and hopefully it can improve especially their reading skill.
















CHAPTER II
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

A.    Theoretical Background
1.      Definition of Reading
Reading is a process of constructing meaning by interacting with text; as individuals read, they use their prior knowledge along with clues from the text to construct meaning. Research indicates that effective or expert readers are strategic (Baker & Brown, 1984a, 1984b). This means that they have purposes for their reading and adjust their reading to each purpose and for each reading task. Strategic readers use a variety of strategies and skills as they construct meaning (Paris, Wasik, & Turner, 1991).
According David Nunan (1989:33) “Reading is not an invariant skill, that there are different types of reading skills that correspond to the many different purposes we have for reading”. So, in the classroom, in students’ reading activities, the writer is sure that they have many purposes, among others are to graduate from their school and to provide themselves with the knowledge to continue their studies whatever their purposes are. In order to achieve the goal, the comprehension ability in reading is needed. Nunan (1989:33) mentions that with the bottom-up approach, the reading is viewed as a process of decoding written symbols, working from smaller units (individual letter) to larger ones (words, clauses and sentences).

According to Olson and Diller (1982:42), what is meant by reading comprehension is a term used to identify those skills needed to understand and apply information contained in a written material. This statement is supported by Harris and Sipay (1980:179), who say that reading comprehension ability is taught to be a set of generalized knowledge acquisition skills that permits people to acquire and exhibit information gained as a consequence of reading printed language. There's even a sense that views reading as a process of giving meaning to visual symbols (Oka, 1983:11 in Jaenal 2010).

According to (Tarigan (1990:7) in Jaenal 2010) argues that reading is a process that is carried and used by readers who want to get the message delivered by the author through the medium of words or written language. According to (Oka (1983:15) in Jaenal 2010) if viewed in terms of differences in scope, it can be distinguished three kinds of meaning to read: Understanding the first is a narrow sense, namely the sense that regards reading it as a process of written symbols recognition. Into this process included the recognition of words carefully, in a wide range, and quickly.

2.      Types of Reading

2.1  Intensive Reading
Brown (1989) explains that intensive reading "calls attention to grammatical forms, discourse markers, and other surface structure details for the purpose of understanding literal meaning, implications, rhetorical relationships, and the like." He draws an analogy to intensive reading as a "zoom lens" strategy .
Long and Richards (1987) say it is a "detailed in-class" analysis, led by the teacher, of vocabulary and grammar points, in a short passage."
Intensive Reading,  sometimes called "Narrow Reading",  may  involve students reading selections by the same author or several texts about the same topic. When this occurs, content and grammatical structures repeat themselves and students get  many opportunities to understand the meanings of the text. The success of  "Narrow Reading" on improving reading comprehension is based on the premise that the more familiar the reader is with the text, either due to the subject matter or having read other works by the same author, the more comprehension is promoted.

How it looks
Characteristics:
·      usually classroom based
·      reader is intensely involved in looking  inside the text
·      students focus on linguistic or semantic details of a reading
·      students focus on surface structure details such as grammar and discourse markers
·      students identify key vocabulary
·      students may draw pictures to aid them (such as in problem solving)
·      texts are read carefully and thoroughly, again and again
·      aim is to build more language knowledge rather than simply practice the skill of reading
·      seen more commonly than extensive reading in classrooms



Materials:
·      usually very short texts - not more than 500 words in length
·      chosen for level of difficulty and usually, by the teacher
·      chosen to provide the types of reading and skills that the teacher wants to cover in the course

Skills developed:
·      rapid reading practice
·      interpreting text by using:

Munby (1979) suggests four categories of questions that may be used in intensive reading. These include:

1.      Plain Sense -  to understand the factual, exact surface meanings in the text
2.      Implications - to make inferences and become sensitive to emotional tone and figurative language
3.      Relationships of thought - between sentences  or paragraphs
4.      rojective - requiring the integration of information from the text to one's own background information
Note that  questions may fall into more than one category.

Assessment:
Assessment of intensive reading  will take the form of  reading tests and quizzes. 
The most common  systems  of questioning are multiple-choice and free-response.
Mackay (1968) , in his book  Reading in a Second Language, reminds teachers that the most important objective in the reading class  should NOT be the  testing of the student to see if they have understood. Teachers  should, instead, be spending most of the time training the student to understand what they read.

When it is used
·      when the objective of reading is to achieve full understanding of:
           - logical argument
           - rhetorical pattern of text
           - emotional, symbolic or social attitudes and purposes of the author
           - linguistic means to an end
·      for study of content material that are difficult

Advantages
·      It provides a base to study structure, vocabulary and idioms.
·      It provides a base for students to develop a greater control of language
·      It provides for a check on the degree of comprehension for individual students

Disadvantages
·      There is little actual practice of reading because of the small amount of text.
·      In a class  with multi-reading abilities, students may not be able to read at their own level because everyone in the class is reading the same material.
·      The text may or may not interest the reader because it was chosen by the teacher.
·      There is little chance to learn language patterns due to the small amount of text.
·      Because exercises and assessment usually follow intensive reading, students may come to associate reading with testing and not pleasure.

2.2  Extensive Reading
Brown (1989) explains that extensive reading is carried out "to achieve a general understanding of a text."
Long and Richards (1971, p.216) identify extensive reading as "occurring when students read large amounts of high interest material, usually out of class, concentrating on meaning, "reading for gist" and skipping unknown words."
The aims of extensive reading  are to build reader confidence and enjoyment.
Extensive  reading is always done for the comprehension of main ideas, not for specific details.

Historical Perspective
·      Harold Palmer (1917) in Britain and Michael West (1926) in India were the first to pioneer the theory of extensive reading as an approach to foreign language teaching and to reading, in particular. Palmer chose the term "extensive reading" to distinguish it from "intensive reading".
·      the 1929 Coleman Report on "Modern Foreign Language Study", introducing the Reading Method , recommended the inclusion of extensive reading in its Method (as distinct from inclusive reading).
          - Students were to read in the second language without a conscious effort to translate.
          - Emphasis was placed on developing independent silent reading and                                             increasing reading rate of  individual students.
          - Frequency word counts were developed and used as a basis for graded readers.
·      Broughton(1978) argued  for the important role Extensive Reading could play in second language programs.
·      Nuttall (1982) wrote that the idea of Extensive Reading should be "standard practice" in second language learning. She suggested the following "slogan":                                               "The best way to improve your knowledge of a foreign language is to go and live among the speakers . The next best way is to read extensively."  (p.168)
·      Krashen (1984) supported Extensive Reading because he felt it automatically gave rise to competence in writing. In 1993, he termed it "free voluntary reading".
·      Krashen (1995) argued that 'free voluntary reading" could be used a a "bridge" from communicative language competence to academic language competence.
·      David Eskey (1995) drew the analogy of reading instruction to teaching swimming strokes to people who hated the water. It would be only through their discovery of the rewards of reading by actually doing it, that they would become people that can and do read.


Characteristics:
Day and Bamford (1980) put forward ten characteristics identified  in successful Extensive Reading Programs. They are duplicated (in abbreviated form) below:
1.      Students read as much as possible.
2.      A variety of materials on a range of topics is available.
3.      Students select what they want to read .
4.      The purposes of reading are usually related to pleasure, information and general understanding.
5.      Reading is its own reward.
6.      Reading materials are well within the linguistic competence of the students in terms of vocabulary and grammar.
7.      Reading is individual and silent.
8.      Reading speed  is usually faster than slower.
9.      Teachers orient students to the goals of the program.
10.  The teacher is a role model of a reader for the students.



2.3  Intensive and Extensive Reading Together
It is common for both approaches to reading to be used in the same class. For example, where extensive reading is encouraged, the teacher may have all the students read the same text so they can discuss the topic together or learn a specific skill such as as writing an outline. 
In a class where intensive reading is mostly used, students may be asked to read texts of their own choosing to report back on,  in either an oral or written format. In both approaches, it is not the nature of the skills that are of most interest but rather, the results.

2.4  Scanning
What it is?
·      Scanning ia a quick reading, focusing on locating specific information.
·      Scanning involves quick eye movements, not necessarily linear in fashion, in which the eyes wander until the reader finds the piece of information needed.
·      Scanning is used when a specific piece of information is required, such as a name, date, symbol,  formula, or phrase, is required. The reader knows what the item looks like and so, knows when he has located  what he was searching for. It is assumed then, that very little information is processed into long-term memory  or even for immediate understanding because the objective is simply matching.



When it is used
·      Scanning is used often with technical, scientific or professional materials to locate specific information.
·      Scanning is a valuable skill for second language learners to develop because often they do not require a detailed read of a text. There are many everyday uses for scanning, relevant to a purpose, such as reading a schedule.

Role of Teacher
·      The teacher selects passages that do include specific information.
·      The teacher may use authentic materials that are commonly scanned in real life, such as the telephone directory, menus, bus schedules.
·      The teacher may ask students before they scan a text to note how the information is organized in the text.
·      The teacher needs to remind students that as they read carefully to find the required information, they should pay particular attention to titles and keywords.

Role of the Student
·      The student forms questions before reading. What specific  information are they looking for?
·      The student looks for contextual clues. The student tries to anticipate what the answer might look like and what sorts of clues would be useful.
·      The student is aware of the graphic form that the answer may take, such as a numeral, a written number, a capitalized word or a short phrase that includes key words.

Activities
·      Activities may include exercises that are devised by the teacher in which students scan for a single word or specific text .
·      Activities may include exercises that are often carried on as a competition so students will work quickly.
·      Students use skills of prediction and anticipation. Students may do any of the following:
-  make predictions and guesses
-  use titles and tables of contents to get an idea of what a passage is about
-  activate prior knowledge about the topic of the passage by answering some questions or performing a quiz
-  anticipate what they want to learn about the top
-  use titles, pictures, and prior knowledge to anticipate the contents of the text
-  use key words, that may have been given to them by the teacher, that do not appear in the text, that allude to the main idea
It is an accepted view today that efficient readers are not passive. They react with a text by having expectations and ideas about the purposes of the text as well as possible outcomes. They reflect on expectations as they read, anticipate what will come next. In other words, they  "interact with the text".


2.5  Skimming
What it is?
·      Skimming is a quick reading to get:
-  to know the general meaning of a passage                                                                                - to know how the passage is organized,  that is, the structure of the text                                     -  to get an idea of the intention of the writer
·      Skimming is a more complex task than scanning because it requires the reader to organize and remember some of the information given by the author, not just to locate it.
·      Skimming is a tool in which the author's sequence can be observed, unlike scanning in which some predetermined information is sought
after.

When it is used
·      Skimming is used when reading some some general question in mind.
·      Skimming is used in making decisions on how to approach a text such as when determining  if a careful reading is deserving.
·      Skimming is used to build student confidence and an understanding that it is possible to gain meaning without reading every word in a text.
·      Skimming is used as part of the SQ3R method of reading, often for speed reading. This method  involves the student in surveying, questioning, reading, reviewing and reciting. Skimming is used for the initial survey and for review.
·      Skimming is a skill that a  student may want to develop if they are planning to continue with academic studies. It  is often used in reviewing for a test.




Role of the teacher
·      Before the students start reading, the teacher should guide students to ask themselves the following questions:
- What kind of audience was the text written for? Was it, for example,  the general public,             technical  readers, or  academic students?
- What type of text is it? Is it, for example, a formal letter, an advertisement, or a set of                instructions?
- What was the author's purpose? Was it , for example, to persuade, to inform or to                         instruct?
·      The teacher should make the following  clear to students before assigning a skimming exercise:
1.      the purpose of the exercise
2.      how deeply the text is to be read

Role of the student
·      Students read through the text in the following manner:
·      Read the title if any.
·      Read the introduction or the first paragraph.
·      Read the first sentence of each of the following paragraphs.
·      Read any headings or sub-headings.
·      Look at any pictures or phrases that are in boldface or italics
·      Read the summary or last paragraph.



Activities
·      Students must locate facts that are expressed in sentences,  not single words.
·      Although speed is essential and the teacher often sets a time limit to the activity,  skimming should not be done competitively. Students should be encouraged individually to better themselves.
·      To improve skimming, readers should read more and more rapidly,  to form appropriate questions and predictions and then read quickly
·      Pugh (1978) suggests that to assess skimming, after the students have read and completed the assigned questions, further questions may be asked, "beyond the scope of the purpose originally set" (p.70).  If students can answer these questions correctly,  it indicates they have read the text too closely.

2.6  Skimming and Scanning Together
Skimming and scanning are sometimes referred to as types of reading and at other times, as skills.
Skimming involves a thorough overview of a text and implies a reading competence. Scanning is more a limited activity, only retrieving information relevant to a purpose.
Brown (1994) suggest ed that "perhaps the two most valuable reading strategies for learners as well as native speakers are skimming and scanning." (p.283)
Pugh (1978) suggested that since scanning is a less complex style of reading it can be introduced first. Skimming requires greater fluency and more practice is required, so it should be introduced later.
Often skimming and scanning are used together when reading a text. For example, the reader may skim  through first to see if it is worth reading, then read it more carefully and scan for a specific piece of information to note.
Students need to learn that they need to adapt their reading and techniques to the purpose of the reading.
By practicing skimming and scanning, the individual learns to read and select specific information without focussing on information that is not important for meaning.

3.      Teaching Reading
Traditionally, the purpose of learning to read in a language has been to have access to the literature written in that language. In language instruction, reading materials have traditionally been chosen from literary texts that represent "higher" forms of culture.
This approach assumes that students learn to read a language by studying its vocabulary, grammar, and sentence structure, not by actually reading it. In this approach, lower level learners read only sentences and paragraphs generated by textbook writers and instructors. The reading of authentic materials is limited to the works of great authors and reserved for upper level students who have developed the language skills needed to read them.
The communicative approach to language teaching has given instructors a different understanding of the role of reading in the language classroom and the types of texts that can be used in instruction. When the goal of instruction is communicative competence, everyday materials such as train schedules, newspaper articles, and travel and tourism Web sites become appropriate classroom materials, because reading them is one way communicative competence is developed. Instruction in reading and reading practice thus become essential parts of language teaching at every level.

4.       Strategic Reading
Reading is a process of constructing meaning by interacting with text; as individuals read, they use their prior knowledge along with clues from the text to construct meaning. Research indicates that effective or expert readers are strategic (Baker & Brown, 1984a, 1984b). This means that they have purposes for their reading and adjust their reading to each purpose and for each reading task. Strategic readers use a variety of strategies and skills as they construct meaning (Paris, Wasik, & Turner, 1991).
A strategy is a plan selected deliberately by the reader to accomplish a particular goal or to complete a given task (Paris, Lipson, & Wixson, 1983; Paris, Wasik, & Turner, 1991). When students are able to select and use a strategy automatically, they have achieved independence in using the strategy. Along with the strategies that expert readers use, they also use a number of comprehension and study skills. It is clear from research that readers develop the use of strategies and skills by reading and writing and being given the support they need to grow in these processes (Wells, 1990).

The goal of all reading instruction is to help students become expert readers so that they can achieve independence and can use literacy for lifelong learning and enjoyment. Learning to use strategies effectively is essential to constructing meaning. Readers who are not strategic often encounter difficulties in their reading (Paris, Wasik, & Turner, 1991). These early difficulties in reading may influence the way readers learn throughout the rest of their lives (Anderson, Hiebert, Scott, & Wilkinson, 1985).

5.      Definition of Comprehension
Comprehension is difficult to define.  At its most basic level, comprehension means understanding what is heard or read.  It is therefore a language activity. Comprehension is different from remembering.  Comprehension is not about defining words or repeating sentences.  Comprehension involves creation of a coherent and integrated understanding of sentences, paragraphs, and text selections.  Integrated means that the comprehender knows that parts of the text go together.  Coherent means that the total understanding fits together as a whole.  There are no pieces missing and there are no parts that don't make sense.
It’s clear that reading comprehension is a complex cognitive process that depends upon a number of ingredients all working together in a synchronous, even automatic way. Vocabulary clearly plays a critical role in understanding what has been read. The reader must also be intentional and thoughtful while reading, monitoring the words and their meaning as reading progresses. And the reader must apply reading comprehension strategies as ways to be sure that what is being read matches their expectations and builds on their growing body of knowledge that is being stored for immediate or future reference.
6.      Some effective techniques for build vocabulary skills:
·      computer-based vocabulary instruction programs
·      storybook reading or listening to others reading aloud
·      learning new words before reading a text
·      task restructuring and repeated exposure (such as having the student encounter the same words in various contexts)
·      substituting easy words for more difficult words (this is particularly helpful with low-achieving students or students with limited English proficiency)

7.      Some effective techniques for building text comprehension skills:
·      comprehension monitoring (helping readers to be aware of their understanding of the material)
·      cooperative learning (pairing students or creating small groupings where students can learn reading and practice strategies together)
·      graphic and semantic organizers (including story maps, where readers make graphic representations of the material to assist comprehension)
·      question answering (readers answer questions posed by the teachers or peers and receive immediate feedback)
·      question generation (readers ask themselves questions about various aspects of the passages being read)
·      story structure (students are taught to use the structure of the story to help them recall story content and answer questions about what they have read)
·      summarization (readers are taught to recall and integrate information gleaned from texts into abbreviated summaries of what they have read)

8.      Reading Purpose and Reading Comprehension
Reading is an activity with a purpose. A person may read in order to gain information or verify existing knowledge, or in order to critique a writer's ideas or writing style. A person may also read for enjoyment, or to enhance knowledge of the language being read. The purpose(s) for reading guide the reader's selection of texts.
The purpose for reading also determines the appropriate approach to reading comprehension. A person who needs to know whether she can afford to eat at a particular restaurant needs to comprehend the pricing information provided on the menu, but does not need to recognize the name of every appetizer listed. A person reading poetry for enjoyment needs to recognize the words the poet uses and the ways they are put together, but does not need to identify main idea and supporting details. However, a person using a scientific article to support an opinion needs to know the vocabulary that is used, understand the facts and cause-effect sequences that are presented, and recognize ideas that are presented as hypotheses and givens.




Reading research shows that good readers:
·      Read extensively
·      Integrate information in the text with existing knowledge
·      Have a flexible reading style, depending on what they are reading
·      Are motivated
·      Rely on different skills interacting: perceptual processing, phonemic processing, recall
·      Read for a purpose; reading serves a function

9.      Reading as a Process
Reading is an interactive process that goes on between the reader and the text, resulting in comprehension. The text presents letters, words, sentences, and paragraphs that encode meaning. The reader uses knowledge, skills, and strategies to determine what that meaning is.

Reader knowledge, skills, and strategies include:
·      Linguistic competence: the ability to recognize the elements of the writing system; knowledge of vocabulary; knowledge of how words are structured into sentences
·      Discourse competence: knowledge of discourse markers and how they connect parts of the text to one another
·      Sociolinguistic competence: knowledge about different types of texts and their usual structure and content
·      Strategic competence: the ability to use top-down strategies (see Strategies for Developing Reading Skills for descriptions), as well as knowledge of the language (a bottom-up strategy)

The purpose(s) for reading and the type of text determine the specific knowledge, skills, and strategies that readers need to apply to achieve comprehension. Reading comprehension is thus much more than decoding. Reading comprehension results when the reader knows which skills and strategies are appropriate for the type of text, and understands how to apply them to accomplish the reading purpose.

B.     Teaching Reading Comprehension
Teaching reading comprehension is a guideline for the teacher to help the students in comprehending in a text easily. According to Klingner, Vaughn, and Boardman (2007:8) teaching reading comprehension is a multi-component and highly complex process that involves interaction between students and teacher. It is supported by Harmer (2008 : 99), in teaching reading comprehension the teacher must consider some aspects, they are students’ reason for reading, reading levels, and reading principle.

Akil (1994) divided the level of comprehension into three levels:
·      Literal level ; where the ideas and information are stated directly in the text
·      Interpretive level ; it is the process of deriving ideas that are implied rather then directly stated.
·      Applied level

It is similar to Anderson (1969), stated that there are three levels of comprehension they are; reading the lines, reading between the lines, and reading beyond the lines. The first level is called literal meaning, this is about what did the author say. The second level is called interpretation, this is about what did the author mean, and the last is called inference and generalization, this is about what generalization would be made.
In conclusion, the reader, the text and the activity are fundamental factors influencing comprehension. In other words, the successful reader does not only need capacities and competencies such as having ( high vocabulary knowledge, good word recognition, fluency, superior memory intelligence for remembering, and connecting to the prior knowledge), understand complexities of text features or language features ( genre, syntax, sentence structure and vocabulary), but also presents some activities such as (purpose for reading, strategies for reading, motivation for reading, and interest in the content of reading) in enabling to comprehend the message or meaning from a text well.
In other hand, Teaching reading comprehension is a complex activity to make the students comprehend and deepen understanding from what they read on the text, where the teacher has the important role in order to help students to be a good reader.

C.    Report Text
Reading has various interesting types of text for the process of teaching and learning in the classroom such as report text. The writer just discuss about report text because this text will be used to apply these strategy. Report is a text which presents information about something. It is as a result of systematic observation and analysis (Jullie Alemi : 2008). This statements is also supported by Grace, she stated in her handbook that report text means a text which presents information about something to describe the way things are such as a man-made thing, animals, and plants. So, it is clear that report text describes the way of certain things and frequently refer to phenomenon of nature, animal and scientific object. Mostly, report is written after getting careful observation.
Furthermore, the purpose of text report is to give a truth account of something, somebody, some place, or same activity after investigating and collecting the facts (Perry and Ron ; 2001). And, The generic structure of report text, are; (a) General classification: (introduce the topic of the report such as the class or subb-class). (b) Identification: tells what the phenomenon under discussion is like in item of: part, qualities, behavior, habit, way or survival. According to Buscesment (2004 ; 278). the indicators of report text are ; the students are able to identify the detailed information of the text, explain the main idea of the report text, explain the meaning and reference of the word in report text and the students are able to conclude the topic.

D.    Definition of REFUND Strategu
REFUND stratrgy is a strategy is a strategy helps students understand text. The teacher gives a short lecture to the students. Because the name of startegy is Reading FO Understand so the mainly strategy is helping the students to be more understant with what they read. After reading, the students discuss the information they read and the lecture of the teacher gave. This strategy also helps the students use their prior knowledge.

E.     Previous Study
To see whether there are relevant researches related to the title discussed, there are several related studies about the variables used in this study:

·      First, Sri Erma Purwanti (2011), conducted a research entitled The use listen-read-discuss strategy to improve reading comprehension. it was an experimental research. And conducted on the second grade of SMP N Tembilahan. Experimental group consist of 30 students, while control group consist of 30 students. the researcher was conducted a pretest before giving the treatment. The result of this study are: the application of this strategy gives a good effect to the students’ reading comprehension. They are more enjoyable in learning reading and comprehend the text easily. The last is there is significant improvement in students’ reading comprehension that taught byusing LRD strategy .
·      Second, Lola Febrina and Dona Alicia (2002) conducted a research entitled Teaching reading comprehension in report text by using listen-readdiscuss strategy, the design of this research was an action reserach design, it was conducted in junior high school,they found that listen-read-discuss strategy is a strategy that builds students’ background knowledge before reading a text by teacher guide through brief explanation orally. And help them comprehend the text by reading to compare the students’ explanationand their understanding about the text.
F.     Reseearch Hypoteis
The writer determine the hypoteis of the research as follows:
·      There is significance difference of students ability in applying reading comprehension who are taught using REFUND tecgnique.
·      There is an improvement ability in applying reading comprehension who are taught using REFUND technique.



















CHAPTER III
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

A.    Type of the Research
The design of the research is classroom actions research (CAR) since it deals with the classroom setting. It focuses on a particular group of a student in a certain classroom.
Classroom Action Research is the integration of teaching and scholarship [where] instructors use data readily available from their classes to answer practical questions about teaching and learning in their classrooms,”. It is less formal than traditional educational research, but more systematic and data-based than teacher reflection
Action research is the process through which teachers collaborate in evaluating their practice jointly; raise awareness of their personal theory; articulate a shared conception of values; try out new strategies to render the values expressed in their practice more consistent with the educational values they espouse; record their work in a form which is readily available to and understandable by other teachers; and thus develop a shared theory of teaching by researching practice.

B.     Subject of the Research
The subjects of this study were students of ctenth grade SMA N 5 Magelang on the reading comprehension skill. The students have less motivated to read the text in English lesson. So they are still to be improved more.

C.    Setting of the Research
The researcher will conduct the research in SMA N 5 Magelang. It is located in Jl. Sidotopo , Magelang Jawa Tengah. This school is very famous in sport aspect because in this school there is sport class to improve the achievement of the school like POPDA.
           
D.    Procedure of the Research
In this research , the researcher will conduct an action research in two cycles.
Before the research begin, the researcher ask the students of tenth graders of SMA N 5 Magelang to do the pre cycle test to know the mastery of reading skill, after that the resarcher gives an action in cycle 1 using discuss technique the process continue in next cycle.


1.      Pre-Cycle
The first step in making classroom action research, the researcher began with observation to know the condition of teaching and learning in the classroom and how teacher introduces new vocabulary directly. The English teacher does not use Game yet in teaching learning. The teacher still uses the conventional method. It means that the teacher speaks and the students just listen, the students are not brave enough to ask question if they do not understand well. After that, the teacher gave pre test to check the students’ reading skill. In this activity students were giving a test. After the researcher got the data from observation and pre test, the researcher analyzes the result to
determine the method would be use in teaching reading using REFUND stratgy.

2.      Cycle 1

Cycle 1 is to know whether there is improvement of student’s reading skill or not. The procedure of cycle 1 as follows:
A.    Planning
In this stage , the researcher makes some activities below:
1). Make the teaching material in lesson plan
2). Prepare the teachig learning technique based on lesson plan
3). Make the obesvation sheet
4). Make the questionnare sheet
5). Make the cycle 1 test


B.     Acting
In this calssroom action research , the researcher wil give the explanation about the REFUND technique is and the goals that would be achieved. This action is done to know the improvement of student’s reading skill.
A.    Pre-Activity
·      The researcher prays together with students
·      The researcehr greets the students
·      The researcher check the student’s attendance
·      The researcger motivates students by giving some questions related to the materials
B.     Main Activity
·      Observing
The researcher introduces the material of the report text in reading skill
·      Asking
The students ask about social function, structure and language features of report text
·      Explorating
1). The students analyze the report text and read the text to answer the question from the researcher
2). The researcher asks the students to read the text carefully

·      Associating
The reasercher manages the class by Using REFUND technique
·      Communicating
1). The researcher ask the students wheter they get difficultion on the repor text
2). Check the student’s comprehension by asks again some question
3). The researcher gives cycle 1 test

C.     Post Acticvity
·      The researcher summarize the main points of the material
·      The researcher gives correct for student’s mistake
·      The researcher gives some suggestion
·      The researcher ends and close the lesson

C.    Observing
This stage is done for the researvher to know through the classroom activity in their reading comprehension skill in teaching and learning process. After that the researcher observes the classroom situation through observation and questionnaire sheet. To complete it, the observation also used the post of cycle. The result of the obesrvation is used as an input to do the next cycle in Cycle 2



D.    Reflecting
In this stage,reflecting is used for analyzing all of the stages in cycle 1 . The Researcher used this stage to know the progress of the student’s behavior in motivation in reading report text and also analyzing the result of data used for reflection to the next cycle.

3.      Cycle 2
This stage is to improev from cycle 1 and it is to treat the calssroom better for their reading skill in report text. The process is similar to the cycle 1 but in cycle 2 there is different topic.
A.    Planning
In this cycle, planning is to improve the lesson plan in cycle 1. The researcher makes a diffeernt topic of the lesson plan from the cycle 1. The researcher also prepare for evaluation such as an observation and queestionnaire.
B.     Acting
These stages the researcher developes the action stage from the cycle 1. In the cycle 2 , the researcher reviews what the students have learned in the previous cycle. The researcher uses a new topic and make a competition by using REFUND technique.
C.    Observing
The researcher observes the activity of the students in learning activity in cycle 2 using observation sheet. Meanwile, the researcer take photograph to know whether there are any different condition with the cycle before.
D.    Reflecting
In this stage , the researcher analyzes all the stages of cycle 1 and 2. The researcher combines the result of each cycle , observation, and questionnaire to know the improvement of the students reading skill in report text using REFUND technique strategy and also the student’s behavior in motivation change and they learning activity is better.


E. The Tecnique of Collecting Data.
In this stage we have 3 technique to collecting data, they are : observation, questioner and documentation.

A. Observation
Pre observation. In the pre-observation session, the colleague observer obtains information from the instructor concerning his or her class goals, students, and particular teaching style. An interview schedule provides a brief, structured way of obtaining such information and includes the following questions:
1. Briefly, what will be happening in the class I will observe?
2. What is your goal for the class? What do you hope students will gain from this session?
3. What do you expect students to be doing in class to reach stated goals?
4. What can I expect you to be doing in class? What role will you take? What teaching
methods will you use? .
5. What have students been asked to do to prepare for this class?
6. What was done in earlier classes to lead up to this one?
7. Will this class be generally typical of your teaching? If not, what will be different?
8. Is there anything in particular that you would like me to focus on during the class?

Details such as the date for the classroom observation, use of a particular observation form or method, and seating arrangement for the colleague observer should also be decided by mutual agreement at this session.Faculty and students have identified the following as characteristics of effective teaching: organization and clarity, command and communication of subject matter, teacher-student rapport, and enthusiasm. Questions listed below may help the observer identify particular skills or techniques in the classroom which illustrate the characteristics of good teaching.
Post Observation. The post-observation conference is most useful if it occurs within a few days of the classroom observation, while the activities are still fresh in the minds of the teacher and colleague observer. No later than one day following the observation, the colleague should review the notes on the class. The colleague observer should then discuss the classroom observation in depth with the teacher.
Series of questions with which to initiate a follow-up discussion would include:
      1. In general, how did you feel the class went?
2. How did you feel about your teaching during the class?
3. Did students accomplish the goals you had planned for this class?
4. Is there anything that worked well for you in class today that you particularly liked?Does  that usually go well?
5. Is there anything that did not work well-that you disliked about the way the class went? Is  that typically a problem area for you? .
6. What were your teaching strengths? Did you notice anything you improved on or any personal goals you met?
7. What were your teaching problems- areas that still need improvement?
8. Do you have any suggestions or strategies for improvement?

The colleague observer can reinforce and add to the instructor's perceptions by referring to the log of class events.

B. Questionnaire
      Q In contrast with interviews, where an enumerator poses questions directly, questionnaires refer to forms filled in by respondents alone. Questionnaires can be handed out or sent by mail and later collected or returned by stamped addressed envelope. This method can be adopted for the entire population or sampled sectors.Questionnaires may be used to collect regular or infrequent routine data, and data for specialised studies. While the information in this section applies to questionnaires for all these uses, examples will concern only routine data, whether regular or infrequent. Some of the data often obtained through questionnaires include demographic characteristics, fishing practices, opinions of stakeholders on fisheries issues or management, general information on fishers and household food budgets.A questionnaire requires respondents to fill out the form themselves, and so requires a high level of literacy. Where multiple languages are common, questionnaires should be prepared using the major languages of the target group. Special care needs to be taken in these cases to ensure accurate translations.In order to maximise return rates, questionnaires should be designed to be as simple and clear as possible, with targeted sections and questions. Most importantly, questionnaires should also be as short as possible. If the questionnaire is being given to a sample population, then it may be preferable to prepare several smaller, more targeted questionnaires, each provided to a sub-sample. If the questionnaire is used for a complete enumeration, then special care needs to be taken to avoid overburdening the respondent. If, for instance, several agencies require the same data, attempts should be made to co-ordinate its collection to avoid duplication.
      The key fact of questionnaire are:
•     Responses can be analyzed with quantitative methods by assigning numerical values to Likert-type scales
•     Results are generally easier (than qualitative techniques) to analyze
•     Pretest/Posttest can be compared and analyzed

                        C. Documentation
      Documentation Consists of examining existing data in the form of databases, meeting minutes, reports, attendance logs, financial records, newsletters, etc.This can be an inexpensive way to gather information but may be an incomplete data source.

           
F. . Technique Analyzing Data
                        Qualitative Data
Qualitative research is a generic term for investigative methodologies described as ethnographic, naturalistic, anthropological, field, or participant observer research. It emphasizes the importance of looking at variables in the natural setting in which they are found. Interaction between variables is important. Detailed data is gathered through open ended questions that provide direct quotations. The interviewer is an integral part of the investigation (Jacob, 1988).
Qualitative research methods were developed in the social sciences to enable researchers to study social and cultural phenomenon. Examples of qualitative methods include:
Action research - aims to contribute both to the practical concerns of people in an immediate problematic situation and to the goals of social science by joint collaboration within a mutually acceptable ethical framework;
Case study research - a case study is an empirical enquiry that investigates a contemporary phenomenon within its real-life context;
Ethnography - the ethnographer immerses her/himself in the life of people s/he studies and seeks to place the phenomena studied in its social and cultural context
                       
The result of qualitative data was used to know the students’ changing behavior and motivation in teaching and learning process of reading test using REFUND technique in each cycle. It was also used to know the students’ improvement to the students’ reading skill.
The result of observation is analized such as below :

SP = SS / R X 100%

Explanation :
SP = Score Precentage  SS = Students Score   R = Respondent

Score=
In this research, the researcher also used mean formula  to know how the average of students score and to check students improvement in raeding. The formula is as follow :

Explanation:
M = The avearge of student score
∑x = Total score
N = The number of students
Scoring guidance
For the test the scoring guidance of speaking aspect to know the stdents vocabulary, pronunciation, grammar, vocabulary, fluency and comprehension.
The writer categorized the scores into very good category, good category, fair category, poor category, and very poor category by using the following analytic scores showed in the table below:






Table Analytic Rating Score
No
Category
Span of Score
1
Very Good
85-100
2
Good
70-84
3
Fair
60-69
4
Poor
50-59
5
Very Poor
<50
Source: Brown, 2004:13



G. Performance Indicator
                        The data conclusion was divided into two parts: firstly, data conclusion of
each cycle and the final conclusion. In conclusion of each cycle, it was
determined whether or not the following action cycle was needed. In this case, an
action was considered completed when the implementation was in accordance
with the planned action.  Secondly, the researcher reflected all information
concerning with the theory used, and the opinion was on the theory related to the
study. The researcher then discussed all information concerning the study to get
the research findings finally the researcher conclude the research findings to
answer the research question.


            The performance indicators of this research are:
1. At least 75% of the students have good motivation in learning the descriptive text speaking skill.
2. At least 75% of the students got score 75.00 in learning the descriptive text speaking skill




           













BIBLIOGRAPHY

Aebersold, Jo Ann & Field M. L. (1997) "From reader to reading teacher", Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Anderson, R.C. (1996) "Research foundations to support wide reading"  in Promoting Reading in Developing Countries , p.55-77. Newark: International Reading Association
Bamford, Julian & Day, R.R. (1997) "Extensive Reading: What is it? Why bother?" Language Teacher Online.  http://langue.hyper.chubu.ac.jp/jalt/pub/tlt/97/may/extensive.html
Bell, Timothy  (2001) "Extensive Reading: Speed and Comprehension", The Reading Matrix, Vol.1, No.1  April 2001 http://www.readingmatrix.com/articles/bell/index.html
Bell, Timothy (1998) "Extensive Reading: Why? And how?" , The Internet Journal , Vol. IV, No.12  http://iteslj.org/Articles/Bell-Reading.html
Blue, George (1992) "Reading in a Foreign Language: A Self-Access Approach" , in Perspectives on Reading , CLE Working Papers 2 , ERIC Document ED392240.
Broughton, G., Brumfit, C., Flavell, R., Hill, P., & Pincas, A. (1978) Teaching English As A Foreign Language. London: Routledge & kegan Paul.
Brown, Douglas (1994) Teaching by principles: an interactive approach to language pedagogy, Upper Saddle River, Prentice Hall Regents.
Clarke, Mark A. &  Silberstein, S. (1987) "Toward a Realization of  Psycho linguistic Principles in the ESL Reading Classroom", in Michael Long and Jack Richards (Eds.) Methodology in TESOL , P.233-247). Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Davis, R.R. & Bamford, J. (2000) "Reaching Reluctant Readers". English Teaching Forum 38 (3)  http://exchanges.state.gov/forum/vols/vol38/no3/p12.htm
Day, R.R. & Bamford,  J.(2002) "Top Ten Principles for Teaching Extensive Reading", 
Reading in a Foreign Language ,Vol.14, No. 2 http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl/October2002/day/day.html
Dupuy, B.,. Tse  L. &  Cook, T. (1996) "Bringing Books Into The Classroom: First Steps in Turning College Level ESL Students Into Readers", TESOL Journal  No. 5, p.10-15.
Elley, W.B. (1996) "Lifting literacy levels in developing countries: Some implications from an IEA study"  in V. Greaney (Ed.), Promoting Reading in Developing Countries  (p.39-54), Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Elley, W.B. & Mangubhai, F. (1983) "The impact of reading on second  language learning ",
Reading Research Quarterly, 19, p.53-67.
Hafiz, F.M. & Tudoe, I. (1989) "Extensive reading and the development of language skills",
ELT Journal, Vol.43/1, p.5-13
Helgesen, M . (1997) "What one extensive reading program looks like", The Language Teacher, 21(5), p.31-33.

Hill, David (1997) "Graded (Basal) readers - choosing the best", The Language Teacher, 21(4), p.21-26   http://langue.hyper.chubu.ac.jp/jalt/pub/tlt/97/may/choosing.html
Hill,  David (1997) "Setting up an extensive reading programme: Practical Tips", The Language Teacher, 21(5), p.17-20.   http://langue.hyper.chubu.ac.jp/jalt/pub/tlt/97/may/hill.html
Jacobs, George &  Renandya, W. &  Bamford, J. (2000) "Annotated Bibliography of Works on Extensive Reading in a Second Language", Reading in a Foreign Language, Vol.13, No1., p.449-522.
Krashen, Steven (1993a) "The case for free voluntary reading", Canadian Modern Language Review,  50(1), p.72-82.
Krashen, Steven (1995) "Free voluntary reading: linguistic and affective arguments and some new applications". in Eckman, F.R. , Highland, D., Lee, P.S., Mileham, J. and Weber, R.R. (Eds.) Second Language Acquisition: Theory and Pedagogy  P.187-202, Mahwal, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Long, Michael  & Richards, J. (1987) Methodology in TESOL, Boston: Heinle & Heinle
Publishers.
Munby, John (1968) "Teaching Intensive Reading Skills" in Mackay, Ronald,  Barkman, B &. Jordan, R.R. (Eds.) Reading in a Second Language, Rowley, Mass: Newbury House Publishers Inc.
Nash, T & Yun-Pi, Y. (1992/1993) "Extensive reading  for learning and enjoyment", TESOL Journal
Nation, Paul (1997) "The language learning benefits of extensive reading", The Language Teacher , 21 (5),  p3-16. http://langue.hyper.chubu.ac.jp/jalt/pub/tlt/97/may/benefits.html
Novak, Sigrud (1982) "Reading laboratories: The conversion of the speed reading lab into an ESL reading lab" , ERIC Document ED238286.
Nuttall, Christine (1982) Teaching reading skills in a foreign language, London: Heinemann Educational Books. (new edition available 1998)
Pugh, A.K. (1978) Silent Reading - an introduction to its study and teaching, London: Heinemamm Educational Books.
Rivers, W.M. (1968) Teaching Foreign Language Skills, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rumelhart, David (1980) "Schemata: the building blocks of cognition" in Spiro, R.J., Bruce, B.C., and Brewer W.E. (Eds.) Theoretical issues in reading comprehension  p.33-58. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Waring, Rob (1997) "Graded and extensive reading - questions and answers" , The Language Teacher, 21 (5)  http://langue.hyper.chubu.ac.jp/jalt/pub/tlt/97/may/waring.html
web site on Extensive Reading:    http://extensivereading.net


1 comments:

 
 
Blogger Templates